Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Challenge to John Edwards!!!!!

In response to the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the national ban on partial birth abortion, all the Democrat candidates for president have issued statements condemning the decision. Apparently they are quite saddened by the fact that there will be no children enduring an "intact dilation and extraction" tomorrow. I mean, think about these idiots - abortion is already legal. This ruling only relates to the most barbaric of all abortion procedures, and these vermin protest.

In any event, John Edwards says this on his website: "I could not disagree more strongly with today's Supreme Court decision" Really, John? You could not disagree more strongly? So there is nothing in the entire world with which you disagree more? Let's try these 5 statements, John, and tell me if you agree with these statements more than you do the Supreme Court's decision.

1. Citizens over the age of 60 should receive no medical treatment to save on health care costs. After all, caring for them is inconvenient.
2. It should be legal to sell babies up to 2 years of age for medical research. Seriously, mother's should be allowed to make this "choice".
3. All citizens with net worths in excess of $100,000 should have all their money confiscated by the government to be allocated to the rest of the country.
4. We should eliminate our borders, and make no distinction between citizens and foreigners.
5. Islam should become the national religion, and we should submit to rule by caliphate.

So just we are all clear: John Edwards would rather agree to these 5 items than outlaw the practice of sucking the brain out of a partially born infant. It's inconceivable that anybody could even consider voting for this man for President of the United States.

Supreme Court Victory! Hillary Weeps for Women's "Rights"

In a major victory for those of us who believe unborn human beings should not be dismembered while quietly resting in the comfort of their mother's wombs, the Supreme Court upheld a national ban on partial birth abortion. Although 1,000,000+ children will still suffer brutal deaths at the hands of abortion doctors and short sighted parents every year, this is still a victory for the pro life crowd.

Most humans who aren't possessed by Satan welcome this ruling. We are now taking one step closer to exiting a very dark time, a time when it was legal to pull a baby 1/2 way out of his mother's womb only to kill it by sucking its brains out. "Intact dilation and extraction", as pro-infanticide advocates call it, will likely be looked back upon by future generations as the most violent act of a violent generation.

So what does Hillary Clinton say about the ruling? "the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito."

I'm literally at a loss for words to describe my contempt for this woman. She wraps herself in the cloak of the "health of the mother" exception, all the while selling her soul to appease her feminist constituents. Read her pathetic, disgusting, satanic defense of partial birth abortion here.

Of course, members of the Democrat party are nothing if not predictable. John Edwards and Barack Hussein Obama bin Illinois also wailed and gnashed their teeth in response to the Supreme Court ruling.

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Queen of the Hypocrites - Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi is busy trying to frame US foreign policy in Syria this week. Working against the wishes of the Whitehouse, Pelosi is looking to make friends with Syrian president Bashar Assad. I guess Nancy's forgotton that Assad's government killed former Lebanese president Rafik Hariri, that Assad's government supports Hamas, that Assad's government supports Hezbullah, and that Assad's government is turning a blind eye towards (if not actively supporting) the support of the Iraqi insurgency.

So what's the first thing Nancy does as she tries to befriend state sponsors of terror? Put on a hijab, of course.

Nancy Pelosi in Syria

How tolerant! How politically correct! Here's a woman who ignores one of the most sacred aspects of her Roman Catholic religion by supporting abortion, yet the first thing she does when she lands in a Muslim nation is strap on a hijab. She spits on the most important teachings of Catholicism, yet blindly adheres to the most insignificant aspects of Islam. Does the fool realize that a large majority of the women in the world who wear such head garb aren't even allowed to vote?